The Weekly Exchange 401kExchange Logo

JUNE 27, 2007
Sponsor Name

Risk Redefined for Retirement Plan Participants

 

Are you looking for a constructive way to talk risk to participants and plan sponsors, especially in turbulent markets?

 

1. Focus on What Really Matters to Your Clients. Regardless of how financially or statistically sophisticated your client and their participants may be, forget standard deviations, betas and the like. Instead, zero in on what’s really at stake: the risk of losing money. Framing the conversation this way emphasizes that your advice is aligned with the client’s interests. And, it sets a more relaxed, less intimidating tone.

 

2. Respect the Fear. Acknowledge that cash equivalents are considered safe, while equities are considered risky. This traditional view of risk is well-founded. Treasury bills, for example, have had positive annual returns each year since 1950. But small-cap stocks have lost money in 16 of the 57 calendar years since 1950, including a 30.9% drop in 1973. And large-cap stocks have lost money in 13 calendar years over the same period, including a negative 26.5% return in 1974.

 

3. Provide the Missing Insight. Time dramatically changes the relative risk of asset classes. This insight, which is the basis for Seligman’s Time Horizon asset allocation strategy, is overlooked in the traditional view of risk, which is based on volatility over short holding periods. On a rolling 10-year basis, the historical risk of losing money in equities was reduced significantly. Out of the 48 10-calendar-year periods from 1950 through 2006, the worst return — the 10 years ending in 1974 — was a positive 3.2% average annual return for small-caps and a positive 1.2% for large-caps.

 

Relative risk changes even more dramatically over rolling 20-year periods. For the 38 20-calendar-year periods from 1950 through 2006, the worst rolling 20-year average annual return for small-caps was positive 8.2% for the period ending in 1974. That worst small-cap return for the same period is better than the best average annual return for Treasury bills, which was 7.2% for the high interest rate period ending in 1991.

 

These observations are illustrated in the chart below. The relative risk of stocks, bonds and cash seen over one-year periods clearly changes over longer time frames.

 

Sponsor Name

 

Figures derived from Ibbotson, Citigroup and FactSet.

 

Average annual returns for periods ended 12/31. Past performance is no guarantee or indication of future results. The return and principal value of an investment in stocks will fluctuate with changes in market conditions. Returns assume reinvestment of any distributions and do not include sales charges or the effect of any taxes; if such charges and taxes had been included, performance would have been lower. Indices are shown for illustrative purposes only and do not represent the performance of any Seligman Fund, or any other security, including any of the Seligman Mutual Funds. For a description of asset classes used and relative risks of the asset classes shown above, please see “Important Risk Information” and “Description of Asset Classes” at the conclusion of this article.

 

 

A critical risk that retirement participants and sponsors should consider is the risk of not having enough money at retirement. Investments traditionally considered “safe” may, over the long term, jeopardize a participant’s financial health by failing to provide sufficient growth. For the longer time horizon of most retirement savers, prudent but meaningful allocations to equity investments have the potential to make a dramatic difference in a participant’s future standard of living.

 

To learn more about Seligman’s Time Horizon asset allocation strategy, please contact Seligman Advisors, Inc. at 888-597-1553.

 

Description of Asset Classes: US Small-Company Stocks: 1979 – 2006: Russell 2000; 1950 – 1978: Ibbotson Small Stock Index. US Large-Company Stocks: Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Index (S&P 500). Investment Grade Fixed Income: 1973 – 2006: Lehman Brothers Government/Credit Bond Index; 1969 – 1972: Estimated as the Citigroup High Grade Corporate Index; 1950 – 1968: Ibbotson Long- Term Corporate Bonds estimate. US Government Bonds: 1973 – 2006: Lehman Brothers Government Bond Index; 1950 – 1972: Ibbotson Long-Term Government Bond Index. Treasury Bills: Ibbotson One Bill Portfolio.

 

Important Risk Information: Stock prices fluctuate and you could lose money. The stocks of smaller companies may be subject to above-average price fluctuations.  Bonds are subject to interest-rate risk, credit risk, prepayment risk, and market risk.

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate with market conditions. Returns do not represent the performance of any Seligman mutual fund, and do not reflect the effect of any management fees or trading costs. If such charges had been included, performance would have been lower.

 

Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market.

 

The views and opinions expressed are provided for general information only, and do not constitute specific tax, legal, or investment advice to, or recommendations for any person. There can be no guarantee as to the accuracy of market forecasts. Opinions, estimates, and forecasts may be changed without notice.

 

This material is authorized for use only in case of a concurrent or prior delivery of the offering prospectus of a Seligman mutual fund, which includes complete information about the investment objectives and strategies, sales charges, expenses, and risk factors. Please read it carefully before investing or sending money.

 

The Seligman Group of Funds is distributed by Seligman Advisors, Inc. This material is distributed by Seligman Advisors, Inc.

  

Return to Newsletter


Visit the
Newsletter
Archive




Unsubscribe
From Future
Newsletters




Copyright ©1996-2006 401kExchange. All Rights Reserved.